GeForce 310M vs A100 SXM4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)GT2xx (2009−2012)
GPU code nameGA100N11M-GE1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)10 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores691216
CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed1410 MHz606 / 625 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate609.14.848
Floating-point performance19.49 gflops0.04896 gflops
Gigaflopsno data73

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2EGDDR3, DDR3
Maximum RAM amount40 GBUp to 1 GB
Memory bus width5120 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2430 MHzUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/s10.67 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA8.0+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 14 Watt

A100 SXM4 has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 310M, on the other hand, has 2757.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 and GeForce 310M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A100 SXM4 is a desktop card while GeForce 310M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4
NVIDIA GeForce 310M
GeForce 310M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 428 votes

Rate GeForce 310M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.