Radeon 740M vs A100 SXM4 80 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated494
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 3 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGA100Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date16 November 2020 (3 years ago)23 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6912256
Core clock speed1410 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1410 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt30 Watt (30 - 15 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate609.140.00
Floating-point performance19.49 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount80 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width5120 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed3.2 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth2,039 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.7
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL2.02.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA8.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 November 2020 23 May 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 30 Watt

Radeon 740M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 80 GB and Radeon 740M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A100 SXM4 80 GB is a desktop card while Radeon 740M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
A100 SXM4 80 GB
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 47 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 40 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.