GeForce RTX 4050 vs A100 SXM4 80 GB

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated120
Place by popularitynot in top-10041
Power efficiencyno data25.87
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA100AD107
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date16 November 2020 (3 years ago)2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores69122560
Core clock speed1095 MHz2505 MHz
Boost clock speed1410 MHz2640 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate609.1211.2
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPS13.52 TFLOPS
ROPs16032
TMUs43280
Tensor Cores432120
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount80 GB6 GB
Memory bus width5120 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1593 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth2,039 GB/s216.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.7
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL2.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA8.08.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 80 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 100 Watt

A100 SXM4 80 GB has a 1233.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4050, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 80 GB and GeForce RTX 4050. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A100 SXM4 80 GB is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4050 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
A100 SXM4 80 GB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GeForce RTX 4050

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 58 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1908 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.