Arc 130T Mobile vs A100 SXM4 40 GB

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Xe2-LPG (2025)
GPU code nameGA100Arrow Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6912896
Core clock speed1095 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1410 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate609.1123.2
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPS3.942 TFLOPS
ROPs16028
TMUs43256
Tensor Cores432112
Ray Tracing Coresno data7

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount40 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width5120 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1215 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.8
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL2.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA8.0-
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 13 January 2025
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 35 Watt

Arc 130T Mobile has an age advantage of 4 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1042.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 40 GB and Arc 130T Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A100 SXM4 40 GB is a workstation card while Arc 130T Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
A100 SXM4 40 GB
Intel Arc 130T Mobile
Arc 130T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 15 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 40 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc 130T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about A100 SXM4 40 GB or Arc 130T Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.