Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded vs A100 PCIe

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGA100Raven
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 June 2020 (4 years ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6912704
Core clock speed1410 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1251 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate609.155.04
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPS1.761 TFLOPS
ROPs1608
TMUs43244
Tensor Cores432no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount40 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width5120 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1215 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.21.2.131
CUDA8.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 June 2020 19 April 2018
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 35 Watt

A100 PCIe has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

RX Vega 11 Embedded, on the other hand, has 614.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 PCIe and Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A100 PCIe is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A100 PCIe
A100 PCIe
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded
Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 31 vote

Rate A100 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 12 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.