Quadro4 700 Go GL vs ATI 3D Rage

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameMach64 GTNV28 A2
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 April 1996 (28 years ago)5 June 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed44 MHz199 MHz
Number of transistors5 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology500 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate0.040.8
ROPs14
TMUs14

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIAGP 4x
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeEDODDR
Maximum RAM amount2 MB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed57 MHz223 MHz
Memory bandwidth456.0 MB/s7.136 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.08.1
OpenGLN/A1.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 1996 5 June 2003
Maximum RAM amount 2 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 500 nm 150 nm

Quadro4 700 Go GL has an age advantage of 7 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage and Quadro4 700 Go GL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that 3D Rage is a desktop card while Quadro4 700 Go GL is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI 3D Rage
3D Rage
NVIDIA Quadro4 700 Go GL
Quadro4 700 Go GL

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 7 votes

Rate 3D Rage on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 700 Go GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.