GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated197
Place by popularitynot in top-10021
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data75.18
Power efficiencyno data27.27
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRage Pro TurboGA107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 March 1997 (27 years ago)2 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed75 MHz1042 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1470 MHz
Number of transistors8 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rate0.08105.8
Floating-point processing powerno data6.774 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUs172
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed75 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth600 MB/s168.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DB13W31x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.14.6
OpenCLNone3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 1997 2 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 8 nm

RTX 3050 6 GB has an age advantage of 26 years, a 76700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI and GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI
3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 937 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.