ATI Rage PRO Turbo AGP vs ATI 3D Rage IIC AGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 2 (1997)Rage 3 (1997−1998)
GPU code nameRage IICRage 3 Turbo
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 1997 (27 years ago)1 March 1997 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed60 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors5 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology500 nm350 nm
Texture fill rate0.060.08
ROPs11
TMUs11

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xAGP 2x
Width1-slot1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSDR
Maximum RAM amount4 MB4 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed83 MHz75 MHz
Memory bandwidth664.0 MB/s600.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.06.0
OpenGLN/A1.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 1997 1 March 1997
Chip lithography 500 nm 350 nm

ATI 3D Rage IIC AGP has an age advantage of 1 month.

ATI Rage PRO Turbo AGP, on the other hand, has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage IIC AGP and Rage PRO Turbo AGP. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI 3D Rage IIC AGP
3D Rage IIC AGP
ATI Rage PRO Turbo AGP
Rage PRO Turbo AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 14 votes

Rate 3D Rage IIC AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 34 votes

Rate Rage PRO Turbo AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.