Xeon 6979P vs i486SX-16

VS

Primary details

Comparing i486SX-16 and Xeon 6979P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel 80486no data
Architecture codename80486 (1989)Granite Rapids (2024)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

i486SX-16 and Xeon 6979P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)120
Threadsno data240
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.02 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate16 MT/sno data
Multiplier1no data
L1 cache8 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data504 MB (shared)
Chip lithography1 µm, 800 nm5 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors1 Millionno data
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on i486SX-16 and Xeon 6979P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno data7529
Power consumption (TDP)no data500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by i486SX-16 and Xeon 6979P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

i486SX-16 and Xeon 6979P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by i486SX-16 and Xeon 6979P are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by i486SX-16 and Xeon 6979P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory size4 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by i486SX-16 and Xeon 6979P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data96

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 120
Chip lithography 1 nm 5 nm

i486SX-16 has a 400% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon 6979P, on the other hand, has 11900% more physical cores.

We couldn't decide between i486SX-16 and Xeon 6979P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that i486SX-16 is a notebook processor while Xeon 6979P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between i486SX-16 and Xeon 6979P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel i486SX-16
i486SX-16
Intel Xeon 6979P
Xeon 6979P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 6 votes

Rate i486SX-16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Xeon 6979P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about i486SX-16 or Xeon 6979P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.