Ultra 5 245KF vs Xeon w9-3575X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon w9-3575X
2024
44 cores / 88 threads, 340 Watt
52.02
+87.9%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
27.68

Xeon w9-3575X outperforms Core Ultra 5 245KF by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon w9-3575X and Core Ultra 5 245KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation33.9682.57
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency14.4820.96
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,789$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 5 245KF has 143% better value for money than Xeon w9-3575X.

Detailed specifications

Xeon w9-3575X and Core Ultra 5 245KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4414 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads8814
Base clock speed2.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache97.5 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm3 nm
Die size4x 477 mm2243 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)79 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon w9-3575X and Core Ultra 5 245KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA46771851
Power consumption (TDP)340 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon w9-3575X and Core Ultra 5 245KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon w9-3575X and Core Ultra 5 245KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon w9-3575X and Core Ultra 5 245KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon w9-3575X and Core Ultra 5 245KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon w9-3575X and Core Ultra 5 245KF.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes11220

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon w9-3575X 52.02
+87.9%
Ultra 5 245KF 27.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon w9-3575X 82624
+87.9%
Ultra 5 245KF 43973

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 52.02 27.68
Recency 24 August 2024 24 October 2024
Physical cores 44 14
Threads 88 14
Power consumption (TDP) 340 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon w9-3575X has a 87.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 214.3% more physical cores and 528.6% more threads.

Ultra 5 245KF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 172% lower power consumption.

The Xeon w9-3575X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 5 245KF in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon w9-3575X is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 245KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon w9-3575X and Core Ultra 5 245KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon w9-3575X
Xeon w9-3575X
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
Core Ultra 5 245KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w9-3575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon w9-3575X or Core Ultra 5 245KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.