Xeon Platinum 8571N vs w9-3495X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon w9-3495X
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
60.50
+35.4%
Xeon Platinum 8571N
2023
52 cores / 104 threads, 300 Watt
44.68

Xeon w9-3495X outperforms Xeon Platinum 8571N by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon Platinum 8571N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1951
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.7010.30
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency15.7613.58
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date15 February 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,889$6,839

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w9-3495X has 82% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8571N.

Detailed specifications

Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon Platinum 8571N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)52
Threads112104
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache105 MB300 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size4x 477 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)81 °C78 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon Platinum 8571N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4677FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon Platinum 8571N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon Platinum 8571N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGX-Yes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon Platinum 8571N are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon Platinum 8571N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC)
Maximum memory size4 TB4 TB
Max memory channels88
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon Platinum 8571N.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes11280

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon w9-3495X 60.50
+35.4%
Xeon Platinum 8571N 44.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon w9-3495X 92595
+35.4%
Xeon Platinum 8571N 68385

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 60.50 44.68
Recency 15 February 2023 14 December 2023
Physical cores 56 52
Threads 112 104
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 300 Watt

Xeon w9-3495X has a 35.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 7.7% more physical cores and 7.7% more threads.

Xeon Platinum 8571N, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon w9-3495X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8571N in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon Platinum 8571N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon w9-3495X
Xeon w9-3495X
Intel Xeon Platinum 8571N
Xeon Platinum 8571N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 176 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3495X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Platinum 8571N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon w9-3495X or Xeon Platinum 8571N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.