EPYC 9575F vs Xeon w9-3475X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon w9-3475X and EPYC 9575F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking62not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.23no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency12.89no data
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Turin (2024)
Release date15 February 2023 (1 year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,739$11,791

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon w9-3475X and EPYC 9575F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3664 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads72128
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache82.5 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size4x 477 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon w9-3475X and EPYC 9575F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA4677SP5
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon w9-3475X and EPYC 9575F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon w9-3475X and EPYC 9575F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon w9-3475X and EPYC 9575F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon w9-3475X and EPYC 9575F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon w9-3475X and EPYC 9575F.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes112128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 February 2023 10 October 2024
Physical cores 36 64
Threads 72 128
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 400 Watt

Xeon w9-3475X has 33.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9575F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 77.8% more physical cores and 77.8% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Xeon w9-3475X and EPYC 9575F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon w9-3475X and EPYC 9575F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon w9-3475X
Xeon w9-3475X
AMD EPYC 9575F
EPYC 9575F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 12 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3475X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9575F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon w9-3475X or EPYC 9575F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.