Core Ultra 5 135U vs Xeon w7-2475X
Aggregate performance score
Xeon w7-2475X outperforms Ultra 5 135U by a whopping 213% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon w7-2475X and Core Ultra 5 135U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 92 | 662 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Meteor Lake-U |
| Architecture codename | Sapphire Rapids | Meteor Lake-P |
| Release date | 15 February 2023 (1 year ago) | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon w7-2475X and Core Ultra 5 135U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 20 (Icosa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 40 | 14 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 37.5 MB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 110 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 76 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon w7-2475X and Core Ultra 5 135U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 4677 | Intel BGA 2049 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon w7-2475X and Core Ultra 5 135U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon w7-2475X and Core Ultra 5 135U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon w7-2475X and Core Ultra 5 135U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon w7-2475X and Core Ultra 5 135U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 | DDR5 |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon w7-2475X and Core Ultra 5 135U.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 64 | 12 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 35.48 | 11.32 |
| Recency | 15 February 2023 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 20 | 12 |
| Threads | 40 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Xeon w7-2475X has a 213.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 66.7% more physical cores and 185.7% more threads.
Ultra 5 135U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.
The Xeon w7-2475X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 5 135U in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon w7-2475X is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 135U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon w7-2475X and Core Ultra 5 135U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
