EPYC 4464P vs Xeon w5-3425

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon w5-3425
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 270 Watt
23.08
EPYC 4464P
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
30.54
+32.3%

EPYC 4464P outperforms Xeon w5-3425 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 4464P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking225135
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation52.1169.97
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency8.0927.53
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date15 February 2023 (1 year ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,189$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4464P has 34% better value for money than Xeon w5-3425.

Detailed specifications

Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 4464P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads2424
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm5 nm
Die size4x 477 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C61 °C
Number of transistorsno data13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 4464P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4677AM5
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 4464P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 4464P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 4464P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 4464P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 4464P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes11228

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon w5-3425 23.08
EPYC 4464P 30.54
+32.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon w5-3425 36659
EPYC 4464P 48518
+32.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.08 30.54
Recency 15 February 2023 21 May 2024
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 105 Watt

EPYC 4464P has a 32.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 157.1% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 4464P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon w5-3425 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 4464P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon w5-3425
Xeon w5-3425
AMD EPYC 4464P
EPYC 4464P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 5 votes

Rate Xeon w5-3425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 8 votes

Rate EPYC 4464P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon w5-3425 or EPYC 4464P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.