Xeon E7-8895 v3 vs X7550
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X7550 and Xeon E7-8895 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1236 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 3.59 | no data |
| Release date | 1 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 1 April 2015 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon X7550 and Xeon E7-8895 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 18 (Octadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 36 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 9.6 GT/s |
| L3 cache | 18 MB L3 Cache | 45 MB Last Level Cache |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 69 °C | 77 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X7550 and Xeon E7-8895 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 8 |
| Socket | FCLGA1567 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 175 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X7550 and Xeon E7-8895 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| PAE | no data | 46 Bit |
Security technologies
Xeon X7550 and Xeon E7-8895 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X7550 and Xeon E7-8895 v3 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X7550 and Xeon E7-8895 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066 | DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1.5 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 102 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X7550 and Xeon E7-8895 v3.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 32 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2010 | 1 April 2015 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 18 |
| Threads | 16 | 36 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 175 Watt |
Xeon X7550 has 34.6% lower power consumption.
Xeon E7-8895 v3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 125% more physical cores and 125% more threads, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon X7550 and Xeon E7-8895 v3. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X7550 and Xeon E7-8895 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
