3015e vs Xeon X7550

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X7550
2010
8 cores / 16 threads, 130 Watt
5.14
+190%

Xeon X7550 outperforms 3015e by a whopping 190% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X7550 and 3015e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12182033
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency3.6126.90
Architecture codenameno dataPollock (Zen) (2020)
Release date1 January 2010 (14 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X7550 and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache18 MB L3 Cache4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature69 °C105 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X7550 and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFCLGA1567FT5
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X7550 and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Security technologies

Xeon X7550 and 3015e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X7550 and 3015e are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X7550 and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X7550 5.14
+190%
3015e 1.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X7550 7873
+190%
3015e 2712

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.14 1.77
Recency 1 January 2010 4 August 2020
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon X7550 has a 190.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

3015e, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 2066.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X7550 is our recommended choice as it beats the 3015e in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X7550 is a server/workstation processor while 3015e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X7550 and 3015e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X7550
Xeon X7550
AMD 3015e
3015e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon X7550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 29 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X7550 or 3015e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.