Ryzen Z1 vs Xeon X7542

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X7542 and Ryzen Z1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated650
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataPhoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiencyno data74.59
Architecture codenameno dataPhoenix (Zen4) (2023)
Release date1 January 2010 (14 years ago)May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X7542 and Ryzen Z1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data6 (Hexa-Core)
Threadsno data12
Base clock speed2.67 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache18 MB L3 Cache16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data137 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °C100 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X7542 and Ryzen Z1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA1567FP8
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X7542 and Ryzen Z1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon X7542 and Ryzen Z1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X7542 and Ryzen Z1 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X7542 and Ryzen Z1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X7542 and Ryzen Z1.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen Z1 has a 1025% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon X7542 and Ryzen Z1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon X7542 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Z1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X7542 and Ryzen Z1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X7542
Xeon X7542
AMD Ryzen Z1
Ryzen Z1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate Xeon X7542 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 46 votes

Rate Ryzen Z1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X7542 or Ryzen Z1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.