Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G vs Xeon X7542
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X7542 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 759 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 5 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 14.82 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| Release date | 1 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 21 July 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon X7542 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.67 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 37 |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 18 MB L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 156 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 69 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9,800 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X7542 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1567 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X7542 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon X7542 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X7542 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X7542 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Vega 7 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X7542 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2010 | 21 July 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G has an age advantage of 10 years, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon X7542 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon X7542 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X7542 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
