E2-3000 vs Xeon X5698

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5698
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
2.17
+372%
E2-3000
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.46

Xeon X5698 outperforms E2-3000 by a whopping 372% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5698 and E2-3000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18442926
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Power efficiency1.582.90
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5698 and E2-3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed4.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz1.65 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache12288 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size239 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5698 and E2-3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket1366FT3
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5698 and E2-3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Security technologies

Xeon X5698 and E2-3000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5698 and E2-3000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5698 and E2-3000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8280
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X5698 and E2-3000 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon X5698 and E2-3000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5698 and E2-3000.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5698 2.17
+372%
E2-3000 0.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5698 3447
+375%
E2-3000 726

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.17 0.46
Recency 14 February 2011 23 May 2013
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon X5698 has a 371.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

E2-3000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5698 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5698 is a server/workstation processor while E2-3000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5698 and E2-3000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5698
Xeon X5698
AMD E2-3000
E2-3000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Xeon X5698 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 26 votes

Rate E2-3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5698 or E2-3000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.