i5-2540M vs Xeon X5698

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5698
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
2.18
+46.3%
Core i5-2540M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.49

Xeon X5698 outperforms Core i5-2540M by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5698 and Core i5-2540M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18422147
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i5
Power efficiency1.584.01
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)1 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$266

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5698 and Core i5-2540M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache12288 KB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size239 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million624 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5698 and Core i5-2540M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
Socket1366FCBGA1023,PPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5698 and Core i5-2540M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon X5698 and Core i5-2540M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5698 and Core i5-2540M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5698 and Core i5-2540M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 3000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.3 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X5698 and Core i5-2540M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5698 and Core i5-2540M.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5698 2.18
+46.3%
i5-2540M 1.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5698 3447
+45.9%
i5-2540M 2363

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.18 1.49
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon X5698 has a 46.3% higher aggregate performance score.

i5-2540M, on the other hand, has 271.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5698 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-2540M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5698 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-2540M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5698 and Core i5-2540M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5698
Xeon X5698
Intel Core i5-2540M
Core i5-2540M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Xeon X5698 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 537 votes

Rate Core i5-2540M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5698 or Core i5-2540M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.