Athlon 64 3500+ vs Xeon X5690

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5690 and Athlon 64 3500+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1322not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.70no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.23no data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)San Diego (2001−2005)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$205$59

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5690 and Athlon 64 3500+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads121
Base clock speed3.46 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.73 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache12288 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm130 nm
Die size239 mm2230 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5690 and Athlon 64 3500+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366939
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5690 and Athlon 64 3500+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5690 and Athlon 64 3500+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5690 and Athlon 64 3500+ are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5690 and Athlon 64 3500+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5690 and Athlon 64 3500+.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5690 7046
+1769%
Athlon 64 3500+ 377

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X5690 545
+322%
Athlon 64 3500+ 129

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X5690 2501
+2056%
Athlon 64 3500+ 116

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 1
Threads 12 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 89 Watt

Xeon X5690 has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 3500+, on the other hand, has 46.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon X5690 and Athlon 64 3500+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon X5690 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 64 3500+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5690 and Athlon 64 3500+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5690
Xeon X5690
AMD Athlon 64 3500+
Athlon 64 3500+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 452 votes

Rate Xeon X5690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 52 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5690 or Athlon 64 3500+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.