Xeon X6550 vs X5687

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5687
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
3.41
+175%
Xeon X6550
2010
8 cores / 16 threads, 130 Watt
1.24

Xeon X5687 outperforms Xeon X6550 by a whopping 175% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5687 and Xeon X6550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15672321
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.45no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency2.440.89
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)no data
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)1 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$121no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5687 and Xeon X6550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.86 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache12 MB (shared)18 MB L3 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature80 °C69 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5687 and Xeon X6550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCLGA1567
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5687 and Xeon X6550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5687 and Xeon X6550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5687 and Xeon X6550 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5687 and Xeon X6550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5687 and Xeon X6550.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5687 3.41
+175%
Xeon X6550 1.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5687 5309
+174%
Xeon X6550 1936

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.41 1.24
Recency 14 February 2011 1 January 2010
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

Xeon X5687 has a 175% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon X6550, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Xeon X5687 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X6550 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5687 and Xeon X6550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5687
Xeon X5687
Intel Xeon X6550
Xeon X6550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 53 votes

Rate Xeon X5687 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 7 votes

Rate Xeon X6550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5687 or Xeon X6550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.