Ryzen 5 3400G vs Xeon X5687

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5687
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
3.41
Ryzen 5 3400G
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.94
+74.2%

Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Xeon X5687 by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5687 and Ryzen 5 3400G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15671112
Place by popularitynot in top-10092
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.45no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency2.448.49
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)12 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$121no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5687 and Ryzen 5 3400G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.86 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache64 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size239 mm2210 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5687 and Ryzen 5 3400G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366AM4
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5687 and Ryzen 5 3400G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5687 and Ryzen 5 3400G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5687 and Ryzen 5 3400G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5687 and Ryzen 5 3400G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size288 GB64 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5687 and Ryzen 5 3400G.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5687 3.41
Ryzen 5 3400G 5.94
+74.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5687 5309
Ryzen 5 3400G 9252
+74.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.41 5.94
Recency 14 February 2011 12 June 2019
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 5 3400G has a 74.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 3400G is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5687 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5687 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 3400G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5687 and Ryzen 5 3400G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5687
Xeon X5687
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Ryzen 5 3400G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 53 votes

Rate Xeon X5687 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2119 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5687 or Ryzen 5 3400G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.