Xeon L5609 vs X5675

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5675
2011
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
4.03
+93.8%
Xeon L5609
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 40 Watt
2.08

Xeon X5675 outperforms Xeon L5609 by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5675 and Xeon L5609 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14101886
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.80no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency4.014.92
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)16 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$162no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5675 and Xeon L5609 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed3.06 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz1.86 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache12288 KB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size239 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °C63 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5675 and Xeon L5609 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt40 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5675 and Xeon L5609. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Demand Based Switching++
PAE40 Bit40 Bit

Security technologies

Xeon X5675 and Xeon L5609 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5675 and Xeon L5609 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5675 and Xeon L5609. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size288 GB288 GB
Max memory channels33
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5675 and Xeon L5609.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5675 4.03
+93.8%
Xeon L5609 2.08

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5675 6396
+93.9%
Xeon L5609 3298

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.03 2.08
Recency 14 February 2011 16 March 2010
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 40 Watt

Xeon X5675 has a 93.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Xeon L5609, on the other hand, has 137.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5675 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L5609 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5675 and Xeon L5609, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5675
Xeon X5675
Intel Xeon L5609
Xeon L5609

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 631 vote

Rate Xeon X5675 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon L5609 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5675 or Xeon L5609, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.