Xeon E5-2698B V3 vs X5675

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5675
2011
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
4.03
Xeon E5-2698B V3
2015
16 cores / 32 threads, 135 Watt
10.25
+154%

Xeon E5-2698B V3 outperforms Xeon X5675 by a whopping 154% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5675 and Xeon E5-2698B V3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1421761
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.08no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency4.017.18
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)January 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$162no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5675 and Xeon E5-2698B V3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1232
Base clock speed3.06 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache12288 KB (shared)40 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size239 mm2356 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data88 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5675 and Xeon E5-2698B V3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA13662011-3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5675 and Xeon E5-2698B V3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5675 and Xeon E5-2698B V3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5675 and Xeon E5-2698B V3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5675 and Xeon E5-2698B V3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5675 and Xeon E5-2698B V3.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5675 4.03
Xeon E5-2698B V3 10.25
+154%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5675 6396
Xeon E5-2698B V3 16287
+155%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.03 10.25
Physical cores 6 16
Threads 12 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 135 Watt

Xeon X5675 has 42.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2698B V3, on the other hand, has a 154.3% higher aggregate performance score, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E5-2698B V3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5675 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5675 and Xeon E5-2698B V3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5675
Xeon X5675
Intel Xeon E5-2698B V3
Xeon E5-2698B V3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 635 votes

Rate Xeon X5675 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 9 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2698B V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5675 or Xeon E5-2698B V3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.