Turion 64 MK-36 vs Xeon X5675

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5675
2011
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
4.03
+1819%
Turion 64 MK-36
1 core / 1 thread, 31 Watt
0.21

Xeon X5675 outperforms Turion 64 MK-36 by a whopping 1819% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5675 and Turion 64 MK-36 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14103207
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.08no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataTurion 64
Power efficiency4.010.64
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Richmond
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$162no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5675 and Turion 64 MK-36 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads121
Base clock speed3.06 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache12288 KB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature81 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5675 and Turion 64 MK-36 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5675 and Turion 64 MK-36. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5675 and Turion 64 MK-36 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5675 and Turion 64 MK-36 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5675 and Turion 64 MK-36. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5675 and Turion 64 MK-36.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5675 4.03
+1819%
Turion 64 MK-36 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5675 6396
+1815%
Turion 64 MK-36 334

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.03 0.21
Physical cores 6 1
Threads 12 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 31 Watt

Xeon X5675 has a 1819% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

Turion 64 MK-36, on the other hand, has 206.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5675 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 MK-36 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5675 is a server/workstation processor while Turion 64 MK-36 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5675 and Turion 64 MK-36, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5675
Xeon X5675
AMD Turion 64 MK-36
Turion 64 MK-36

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 633 votes

Rate Xeon X5675 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 9 votes

Rate Turion 64 MK-36 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5675 or Turion 64 MK-36, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.