i3-6100T vs Xeon X5675

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5675
2011
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
4.03
+75.2%
Core i3-6100T
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.30

Xeon X5675 outperforms Core i3-6100T by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5675 and Core i3-6100T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14221816
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.080.56
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiency4.016.22
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$162$117

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X5675 has 629% better value for money than i3-6100T.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5675 and Core i3-6100T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads124
Base clock speed3.06 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache12288 KB (shared)3 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size239 mm298.57 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °C66 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5675 and Core i3-6100T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5675 and Core i3-6100T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5675 and Core i3-6100T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5675 and Core i3-6100T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5675 and Core i3-6100T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600
Maximum memory size288 GB64 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 530
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data950 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X5675 and Core i3-6100T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon X5675 and Core i3-6100T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon X5675 and Core i3-6100T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5675 and Core i3-6100T.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5675 4.03
+75.2%
i3-6100T 2.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5675 6396
+75.2%
i3-6100T 3651

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X5675 502
i3-6100T 1055
+110%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X5675 2464
+17.4%
i3-6100T 2099

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.03 2.30
Recency 14 February 2011 1 September 2015
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon X5675 has a 75.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

i3-6100T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5675 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-6100T in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5675 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-6100T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5675 and Core i3-6100T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5675
Xeon X5675
Intel Core i3-6100T
Core i3-6100T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 635 votes

Rate Xeon X5675 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 89 votes

Rate Core i3-6100T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5675 or Core i3-6100T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.