Solo T1200 vs Xeon X5675

Place in the ranking	1421	3304
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.08	no data
Market segment	Server	Laptop
Series	no data	Core Solo
Power efficiency	4.01	0.56
Architecture codename	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)	Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date	14 February 2011 (13 years ago)	January 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$162	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5675 and Core Solo T1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	6 (Hexa-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	12	1
Base clock speed	3.06 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	3.46 GHz	1.5 GHz
Bus rate	no data	667 MHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	64 KB
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	2 MB
L3 cache	12288 KB (shared)	0 KB
Chip lithography	32 nm	65 nm
Die size	239 mm²	90 mm²
Maximum core temperature	81 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,170 million	151 million
64 bit support	+	-
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5675 and Core Solo T1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	1
Socket	FCLGA1366,LGA1366	479
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5675 and Core Solo T1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	1.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	no data
PAE	40 Bit	no data

Security technologies

Xeon X5675 and Core Solo T1200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5675 and Core Solo T1200 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5675 and Core Solo T1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR1
Maximum memory size	288 GB	no data
Max memory channels	3	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	32 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5675 and Core Solo T1200.

PCIe version

2.0

no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.03	0.16
Physical cores	6	1
Threads	12	1
Chip lithography	32 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	27 Watt

Xeon X5675 has a 2418.8% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Solo T1200, on the other hand, has 251.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5675 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Solo T1200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5675 is a server/workstation processor while Core Solo T1200 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5675 and Core Solo T1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.