Atom Z2480 vs Xeon X5675
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X5675 and Atom Z2480 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1341 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.19 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Penwell (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 14 February 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 January 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $162 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon X5675 and Atom Z2480 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.066 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.46 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12288 KB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 239 mm2 | 65 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 81 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5675 and Atom Z2480 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 1366 | Intel BGA 617 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5675 and Atom Z2480. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon X5675 and Atom Z2480 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5675 and Atom Z2480 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5675 and Atom Z2480. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | 6.4 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | PowerVR SGX540 (400 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5675 and Atom Z2480.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 February 2011 | 1 January 2013 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 3 Watt |
Xeon X5675 has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
Atom Z2480, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 3066.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon X5675 and Atom Z2480. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon X5675 is a server/workstation processor while Atom Z2480 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5675 and Atom Z2480, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
