A6-9210 vs Xeon X5675

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5675
2011
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
4.18
+410%

Xeon X5675 outperforms A6-9210 by a whopping 410% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5675 and A6-9210 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14052613
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.88no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency4.014.98
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$162no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5675 and A6-9210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.06 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache12288 KB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size239 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5675 and A6-9210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FP4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt10-15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5675 and A6-9210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Virtualization,
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5675 and A6-9210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5675 and A6-9210 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5675 and A6-9210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels31
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 Graphics
iGPU core countno data3
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X5675 and A6-9210 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon X5675 and A6-9210 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5675 and A6-9210.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5675 4.18
+410%
A6-9210 0.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5675 6396
+413%
A6-9210 1248

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X5675 504
+51.8%
A6-9210 332

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X5675 2462
+375%
A6-9210 518

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.18 0.82
Recency 14 February 2011 1 June 2016
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon X5675 has a 409.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

A6-9210, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 850% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5675 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9210 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5675 is a server/workstation processor while A6-9210 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5675 and A6-9210, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5675
Xeon X5675
AMD A6-9210
A6-9210

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 630 votes

Rate Xeon X5675 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 151 vote

Rate A6-9210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5675 or A6-9210, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.