Xeon W3520 vs X5672

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5672
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.15
+71.2%
Xeon W3520
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
1.84

Xeon X5672 outperforms Xeon W3520 by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5672 and Xeon W3520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16121991
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.140.26
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.141.34
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Bloomfield (2008−2010)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)30 March 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$115$404

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X5672 has 1108% better value for money than Xeon W3520.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5672 and Xeon W3520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.93 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size239 mm2263 mm2
Maximum core temperature83 °C68 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million731 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5672 and Xeon W3520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5672 and Xeon W3520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Demand Based Switching++
PAE40 Bit36 Bit

Security technologies

Xeon X5672 and Xeon W3520 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5672 and Xeon W3520 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5672 and Xeon W3520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size288 GB24 GB
Max memory channels33
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5672 and Xeon W3520.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5672 3.15
+71.2%
Xeon W3520 1.84

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5672 4996
+70.9%
Xeon W3520 2924

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.15 1.84
Recency 14 February 2011 30 March 2009
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 130 Watt

Xeon X5672 has a 71.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 36.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5672 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W3520 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5672 and Xeon W3520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5672
Xeon X5672
Intel Xeon W3520
Xeon W3520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 14 votes

Rate Xeon X5672 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 120 votes

Rate Xeon W3520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5672 or Xeon W3520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.