Atom S1240 vs Xeon X5672
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X5672 and Atom S1240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1604 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.19 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 3.13 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Centerton (2012) |
| Release date | 14 February 2011 (13 years ago) | 11 December 2012 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $115 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon X5672 and Atom S1240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 56 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 239 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 83 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5672 and Atom S1240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1366,LGA1366 | FCBGA1283 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 6.1 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5672 and Atom S1240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 40 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon X5672 and Atom S1240 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5672 and Atom S1240 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5672 and Atom S1240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 288 GB | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | 3 | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | 10.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5672 and Atom S1240.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
| PCI support | no data | PCI Support |
| UART | no data | UART |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 February 2011 | 11 December 2012 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 6 Watt |
Xeon X5672 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Atom S1240, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 1483.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon X5672 and Atom S1240. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5672 and Atom S1240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
