Celeron M 440 vs Xeon X5670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5670 and Celeron M 440 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1440not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.06no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesXeon (Desktop)Celeron M
Power efficiency3.83no data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$67no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5670 and Celeron M 440 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads121
Base clock speed2.93 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed3.33 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus rate6400 MHz533 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache12 MB (shared)1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature81 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.0V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5670 and Celeron M 440 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5670 and Celeron M 440. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE40 Bit32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon X5670 and Celeron M 440 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5670 and Celeron M 440 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5670 and Celeron M 440. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5670 and Celeron M 440.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5670 6104
+3512%
Celeron M 440 169

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Xeon X5670 5794
+491%
Celeron M 440 980

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 1
Threads 12 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 27 Watt

Xeon X5670 has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 440, on the other hand, has 251.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon X5670 and Celeron M 440. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon X5670 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M 440 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5670 and Celeron M 440, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5670
Xeon X5670
Intel Celeron M 440
Celeron M 440

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 473 votes

Rate Xeon X5670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 12 votes

Rate Celeron M 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5670 or Celeron M 440, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.