A9-9400 SoC vs Xeon X5670
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X5670 and A9-9400 SoC processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1453 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.06 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Series | Xeon (Desktop) | no data |
Power efficiency | 3.83 | no data |
Architecture codename | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
Release date | 16 March 2010 (14 years ago) | 31 May 2016 (8 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $67 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon X5670 and A9-9400 SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 12 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Bus rate | 6400 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 160 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | 239 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 81 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 1,200 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5670 and A9-9400 SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA1366,LGA1366 | FT4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5670 and A9-9400 SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
PAE | 40 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon X5670 and A9-9400 SoC technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5670 and A9-9400 SoC are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5670 and A9-9400 SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 288 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Radeon R5 3CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5670 and A9-9400 SoC.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 16 March 2010 | 31 May 2016 |
Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
Threads | 12 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 10 Watt |
Xeon X5670 has 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
A9-9400 SoC, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 850% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon X5670 and A9-9400 SoC. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon X5670 is a server/workstation processor while A9-9400 SoC is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5670 and A9-9400 SoC, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.