Xeon E5520 vs X5647

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5647
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
2.80
+76.1%
Xeon E5520
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
1.59

Xeon X5647 outperforms Xeon E5520 by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5647 and Xeon E5520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16752096
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.782.58
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency2.041.88
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Gainestown (2009−2010)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)30 March 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$175$19

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5520 has 45% better value for money than Xeon X5647.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5647 and Xeon E5520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.93 GHz2.26 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.53 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size239 mm2263 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °C72 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million731 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5647 and Xeon E5520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5647 and Xeon E5520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Demand Based Switching++
PAE40 Bit40 Bit

Security technologies

Xeon X5647 and Xeon E5520 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5647 and Xeon E5520 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5647 and Xeon E5520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size288 GB144 GB
Max memory channels33
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5647 and Xeon E5520.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5647 2.80
+76.1%
Xeon E5520 1.59

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5647 4441
+75.6%
Xeon E5520 2529

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.80 1.59
Recency 14 February 2011 30 March 2009
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 80 Watt

Xeon X5647 has a 76.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5520, on the other hand, has 62.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5647 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5520 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5647 and Xeon E5520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5647
Xeon X5647
Intel Xeon E5520
Xeon E5520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 17 votes

Rate Xeon X5647 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 28 votes

Rate Xeon E5520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5647 or Xeon E5520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.