A6-5200 vs Xeon X5647

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5647
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
2.90
+166%

Xeon X5647 outperforms A6-5200 by a whopping 166% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5647 and A6-5200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16672415
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.62no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency2.033.98
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$175no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5647 and A6-5200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.93 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size239 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5647 and A6-5200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FT3
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5647 and A6-5200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.286x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5647 and A6-5200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5647 and A6-5200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5647 and A6-5200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels31
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8400
Number of pipelinesno data128
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X5647 and A6-5200 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon X5647 and A6-5200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5647 and A6-5200.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5647 2.90
+166%
A6-5200 1.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5647 4441
+167%
A6-5200 1663

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.90 1.09
Recency 14 February 2011 23 May 2013
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 25 Watt

Xeon X5647 has a 166.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

A6-5200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 420% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5647 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5647 is a server/workstation processor while A6-5200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5647 and A6-5200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5647
Xeon X5647
AMD A6-5200
A6-5200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 17 votes

Rate Xeon X5647 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 210 votes

Rate A6-5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5647 or A6-5200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.