Celeron G5900 vs Xeon X5492
Aggregate performance score
Xeon X5492 outperforms Celeron G5900 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X5492 and Celeron G5900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1914 | 1979 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.40 | 8.43 |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Architecture codename | no data | Comet Lake (2020) |
Release date | 1 July 2008 (16 years ago) | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Celeron G5900 has 2008% better value for money than Xeon X5492.
Detailed specifications
Xeon X5492 and Celeron G5900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | no data | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | no data | 2 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 3.4 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 256K (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 2 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | no data | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 63 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5492 and Celeron G5900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | no data | 1200 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 58 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5492 and Celeron G5900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | no data | + |
AVX | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon X5492 and Celeron G5900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5492 and Celeron G5900 are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5492 and Celeron G5900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2666 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 41.6 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | UHD 610 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5492 and Celeron G5900.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon X5492 outperforms Celeron G5900 by 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon X5492 outperforms Celeron G5900 by 10% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.88 | 1.71 |
Recency | 1 July 2008 | 30 April 2020 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 58 Watt |
Xeon X5492 has a 9.9% higher aggregate performance score.
Celeron G5900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and 158.6% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon X5492 and Celeron G5900.
Be aware that Xeon X5492 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G5900 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5492 and Celeron G5900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.