Celeron N6211 vs Xeon X5470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5470
2008
120 Watt
1.83
+29.8%
Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.41

Xeon X5470 outperforms Celeron N6211 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5470 and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19942198
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.33
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataElkhart Lake
Power efficiency1.4420.53
Architecture codenameno dataElkhart Lake (2022)
Release date1 July 2008 (16 years ago)17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5470 and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed3.33 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3 GHz
L2 cacheno data1.5 MB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature63 °C70 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5470 and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketLGA771BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5470 and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon X5470 and Celeron N6211 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5470 and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5470 and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5470 1.83
+29.8%
Celeron N6211 1.41

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5470 2910
+29.6%
Celeron N6211 2245

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.83 1.41
Recency 1 July 2008 17 July 2022
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon X5470 has a 29.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 1900% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5470 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5470 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N6211 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5470 and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5470
Xeon X5470
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 102 votes

Rate Xeon X5470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5470 or Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.