Xeon X7350 vs X5365
Aggregate performance score
Xeon X7350 outperforms Xeon X5365 by a whopping 235% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X5365 and Xeon X7350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2160 | 1229 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.93 | 3.59 |
| Release date | 1 July 2007 (17 years ago) | 1 July 2007 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon X5365 and Xeon X7350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
| L3 cache | 8 MB L2 Cache | 8 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 63 °C | 66 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1V-1.5V | 1V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5365 and Xeon X7350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PLGA771 | PGA604,PPGA604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5365 and Xeon X7350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Demand Based Switching | + | + |
| FSB parity | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon X5365 and Xeon X7350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5365 and Xeon X7350 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | - | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.47 | 4.93 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 130 Watt |
Xeon X7350 has a 235.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 15.4% lower power consumption.
The Xeon X7350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5365 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5365 and Xeon X7350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
