EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon X5260

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5260
2007
80 Watt
0.79
EPYC 73F3
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 240 Watt
29.58
+3644%

EPYC 73F3 outperforms Xeon X5260 by a whopping 3644% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5260 and EPYC 73F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2621153
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.26
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency0.9211.45
Architecture codenameno dataMilan (2021−2023)
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,521

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5260 and EPYC 73F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threadsno data32
Base clock speed3.33 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4 GHz
Multiplierno data35
L1 cacheno data1 MB
L2 cacheno data8 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5260 and EPYC 73F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketLGA771SP3
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5260 and EPYC 73F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Xeon X5260 and EPYC 73F3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5260 and EPYC 73F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5260 and EPYC 73F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5260 and EPYC 73F3.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5260 0.79
EPYC 73F3 29.58
+3644%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5260 1238
EPYC 73F3 46103
+3624%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 29.58
Recency 1 October 2007 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 240 Watt

Xeon X5260 has 200% lower power consumption.

EPYC 73F3, on the other hand, has a 3644.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 73F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5260 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5260 and EPYC 73F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5260
Xeon X5260
AMD EPYC 73F3
EPYC 73F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 20 votes

Rate Xeon X5260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 73F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5260 or EPYC 73F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.