Ultra 7 265F vs Xeon X3480

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3480 and Core Ultra 7 265F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1890not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.05no data
Architecture codenameno dataArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 April 2010 (14 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3480 and Core Ultra 7 265F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads820
Base clock speed3.06 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.73 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data3 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3480 and Core Ultra 7 265F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA11561851
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3480 and Core Ultra 7 265F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X3480 and Core Ultra 7 265F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3480 and Core Ultra 7 265F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3480 and Core Ultra 7 265F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3480 and Core Ultra 7 265F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 20
Threads 8 20
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Ultra 7 265F has 400% more physical cores and 150% more threads, a 1400% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon X3480 and Core Ultra 7 265F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon X3480 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3480 and Core Ultra 7 265F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3480
Xeon X3480
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Core Ultra 7 265F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 142 votes

Rate Xeon X3480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3480 or Core Ultra 7 265F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.