A8-3870K vs Xeon X3480

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3480
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.06
+40.1%
A8-3870K
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.47

Xeon X3480 outperforms A8-3870K by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3480 and A8-3870K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18922162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.051.39
Architecture codenameno dataLlano (2011−2012)
Release date1 April 2010 (14 years ago)20 December 2011 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3480 and A8-3870K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.06 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.73 GHz3 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data228 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3480 and A8-3870K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FM1
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3480 and A8-3870K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X3480 and A8-3870K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3480 and A8-3870K are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3480 and A8-3870K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6550D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3480 and A8-3870K.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3480 2.06
+40.1%
A8-3870K 1.47

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3480 3273
+40.6%
A8-3870K 2328

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.06 1.47
Recency 1 April 2010 20 December 2011
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 100 Watt

Xeon X3480 has a 40.1% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and 5.3% lower power consumption.

A8-3870K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon X3480 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-3870K in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3480 is a server/workstation processor while A8-3870K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3480 and A8-3870K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3480
Xeon X3480
AMD A8-3870K
A8-3870K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 142 votes

Rate Xeon X3480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 213 votes

Rate A8-3870K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3480 or A8-3870K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.