E2-2000 vs Xeon X3470
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X3470 and E2-2000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1885 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | no data | AMD E-Series |
Power efficiency | 2.05 | no data |
Architecture codename | no data | Zacate (2011−2013) |
Release date | 1 July 2009 (15 years ago) | 6 January 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon X3470 and E2-2000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.93 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.75 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 40 nm |
Die size | no data | 75 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 73 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 100 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X3470 and E2-2000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA1156,LGA1156 | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3470 and E2-2000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V |
PowerNow | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon X3470 and E2-2000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3470 and E2-2000 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3470 and E2-2000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 7340 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3470 and E2-2000.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 July 2009 | 6 January 2013 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 18 Watt |
Xeon X3470 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
E2-2000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 427.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon X3470 and E2-2000. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon X3470 is a server/workstation processor while E2-2000 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3470 and E2-2000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.