Pentium G6950 vs Xeon X3460
Aggregate performance score
Xeon X3460 outperforms Pentium G6950 by a whopping 139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X3460 and Pentium G6950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1903 | 2534 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.70 | 0.02 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | no data | Clarkdale (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 1 July 2009 (15 years ago) | 7 January 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $60 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon X3460 has 3400% better value for money than Pentium G6950.
Detailed specifications
Xeon X3460 and Pentium G6950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | no data | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 3 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | no data | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 73 °C | 73 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 382 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X3460 and Pentium G6950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 1156 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 73 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3460 and Pentium G6950 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3460 and Pentium G6950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | 17 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3460 and Pentium G6950.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon X3460 outperforms Pentium G6950 by 139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon X3460 outperforms Pentium G6950 by 139% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Xeon X3460 outperforms Pentium G6950 by 49% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Xeon X3460 outperforms Pentium G6950 by 189% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.91 | 0.80 |
| Recency | 1 July 2009 | 7 January 2010 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 73 Watt |
Xeon X3460 has a 138.8% higher aggregate performance score.
Pentium G6950, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 30.1% lower power consumption.
The Xeon X3460 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G6950 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon X3460 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium G6950 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3460 and Pentium G6950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
