Celeron G1820TE vs Xeon X3440

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3440
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
1.75
+173%
Celeron G1820TE
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 54 Watt
0.64

Xeon X3440 outperforms Celeron G1820TE by a whopping 173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3440 and Celeron G1820TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20232753
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.741.12
Architecture codenameno dataHaswell (2013−2015)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)1 December 2013 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3440 and Celeron G1820TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.53 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data177 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3440 and Celeron G1820TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA11561150
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3440 and Celeron G1820TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X3440 and Celeron G1820TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3440 and Celeron G1820TE are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3440 and Celeron G1820TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD (Haswell)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3440 and Celeron G1820TE.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3440 1.75
+173%
Celeron G1820TE 0.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3440 2773
+172%
Celeron G1820TE 1020

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.75 0.64
Recency 1 July 2009 1 December 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 54 Watt

Xeon X3440 has a 173.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron G1820TE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 75.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X3440 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1820TE in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3440 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G1820TE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3440 and Celeron G1820TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3440
Xeon X3440
Intel Celeron G1820TE
Celeron G1820TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 645 votes

Rate Xeon X3440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron G1820TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3440 or Celeron G1820TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.