Celeron G1101 vs Xeon X3440

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3440
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
1.75
+157%
Celeron G1101
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 73 Watt
0.68

Xeon X3440 outperforms Celeron G1101 by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3440 and Celeron G1101 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20252719
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.97
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.740.88
Architecture codenameno dataClarkdale (2010−2011)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$85

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3440 and Celeron G1101 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.53 GHz2.26 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz0.27 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data382 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3440 and Celeron G1101 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FCLGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3440 and Celeron G1101. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE36 Bit36 Bit
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Xeon X3440 and Celeron G1101 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3440 and Celeron G1101 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3440 and Celeron G1101. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16.38 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s17 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X3440 and Celeron G1101 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3440 and Celeron G1101.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes161

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3440 1.75
+157%
Celeron G1101 0.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3440 2773
+155%
Celeron G1101 1086

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.75 0.68
Recency 1 July 2009 7 January 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 73 Watt

Xeon X3440 has a 157.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron G1101, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 30.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X3440 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1101 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3440 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G1101 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3440 and Celeron G1101, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3440
Xeon X3440
Intel Celeron G1101
Celeron G1101

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 649 votes

Rate Xeon X3440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G1101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3440 or Celeron G1101, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.