Xeon Platinum 8153 vs X3430

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3430
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.48
Xeon Platinum 8153
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
20.64
+1295%

Xeon Platinum 8153 outperforms Xeon X3430 by a whopping 1295% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3430 and Xeon Platinum 8153 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2168272
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.60
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Platinum
Power efficiency1.4515.34
Architecture codenameno dataSkylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)25 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,115

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3430 and Xeon Platinum 8153 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.8 GHz
Multiplierno data20
L1 cacheno data1 MB
L2 cacheno data16 MB
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache22 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature73 °C87 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3430 and Xeon Platinum 8153 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration18 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3430 and Xeon Platinum 8153. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Xeon X3430 and Xeon Platinum 8153 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3430 and Xeon Platinum 8153 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3430 and Xeon Platinum 8153. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size32 GB768 GB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3430 and Xeon Platinum 8153.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1648

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3430 1.48
Xeon Platinum 8153 20.64
+1295%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3430 2305
Xeon Platinum 8153 32180
+1296%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.48 20.64
Recency 1 July 2009 25 April 2017
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon X3430 has 31.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8153, on the other hand, has a 1294.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8153 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3430 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3430 and Xeon Platinum 8153, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3430
Xeon X3430
Intel Xeon Platinum 8153
Xeon Platinum 8153

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 141 vote

Rate Xeon X3430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8153 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3430 or Xeon Platinum 8153, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.