Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs Xeon X3430
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X3430 and Core 2 Duo SL9400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2170 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Core 2 Duo |
Power efficiency | 1.44 | no data |
Architecture codename | no data | Penryn (2008−2011) |
Release date | 1 July 2009 (15 years ago) | 20 August 2008 (16 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $284 |
Detailed specifications
Xeon X3430 and Core 2 Duo SL9400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 1066 MHz |
L2 cache | no data | 6 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | no data | 107 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 73 °C | 105 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 410 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | no data | 1.05V - 1.15V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X3430 and Core 2 Duo SL9400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FCLGA1156,LGA1156 | BGA956 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3430 and Core 2 Duo SL9400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
Idle States | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | + | - |
PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Xeon X3430 and Core 2 Duo SL9400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3430 and Core 2 Duo SL9400 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3430 and Core 2 Duo SL9400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3430 and Core 2 Duo SL9400.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 July 2009 | 20 August 2008 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 17 Watt |
Xeon X3430 has an age advantage of 10 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Core 2 Duo SL9400, on the other hand, has 458.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon X3430 and Core 2 Duo SL9400. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon X3430 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo SL9400 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3430 and Core 2 Duo SL9400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.