Athlon Gold 3150U vs Xeon X3380

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3380
2009
95 Watt
1.65
Athlon Gold 3150U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.56
+55.2%

Athlon Gold 3150U outperforms Xeon X3380 by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3380 and Athlon Gold 3150U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20861741
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Power efficiency1.6115.85
Architecture codenameno dataDali (Zen) (2020)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3380 and Athlon Gold 3150U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed3.16 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Multiplierno data24
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature71 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3380 and Athlon Gold 3150U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketLGA775FP5
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3380 and Athlon Gold 3150U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon X3380 and Athlon Gold 3150U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3380 and Athlon Gold 3150U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3380 and Athlon Gold 3150U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3380 and Athlon Gold 3150U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3380 1.65
Athlon Gold 3150U 2.56
+55.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3380 2568
Athlon Gold 3150U 3987
+55.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.65 2.56
Recency 1 January 2009 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

Athlon Gold 3150U has a 55.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The Athlon Gold 3150U is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3380 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3380 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon Gold 3150U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3380 and Athlon Gold 3150U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3380
Xeon X3380
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
Athlon Gold 3150U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Xeon X3380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 904 votes

Rate Athlon Gold 3150U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3380 or Athlon Gold 3150U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.