EPYC 7513 vs Xeon X3370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3370
2008
95 Watt
1.58
EPYC 7513
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
38.03
+2307%

EPYC 7513 outperforms Xeon X3370 by a whopping 2307% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3370 and EPYC 7513 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking211285
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.58
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency1.5417.66
Architecture codenameno dataMilan (2021−2023)
Release date1 July 2008 (16 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,840

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3370 and EPYC 7513 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threadsno data64
Base clock speed3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.65 GHz
Multiplierno data26
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3370 and EPYC 7513 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketLGA775SP3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3370 and EPYC 7513. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Xeon X3370 and EPYC 7513 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3370 and EPYC 7513 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3370 and EPYC 7513. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3370 and EPYC 7513.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3370 1.58
EPYC 7513 38.03
+2307%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3370 2465
EPYC 7513 59285
+2305%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.58 38.03
Recency 1 July 2008 15 March 2021
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 200 Watt

Xeon X3370 has 110.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7513, on the other hand, has a 2307% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7513 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3370 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3370 and EPYC 7513, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3370
Xeon X3370
AMD EPYC 7513
EPYC 7513

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 15 votes

Rate Xeon X3370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate EPYC 7513 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3370 or EPYC 7513, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.